power and supervillainy
- July 2nd, 2013
- Posted in Uncategorized
- Write comment
Over at Livejournal, Brooke writes about harassment at SF conventions in a long post worth reading, not the least of which being for the observation that men, overwhelmingly, have no idea it’s even going on.
There’ve been a lot of these posts lately; Amy’s post specifically got Brooke going; Scalzi hosted a guest post by Elise Matthesen about how to report harrassment after getting creepered by James Frenkel and a followup post laying down conditions for his attendance (I’d’ve written about that last week if I hadn’t been on the road); and Jim Hines talks about how Mr. Frenkel’s been doing it for years, because people get talked out of formally reporting it.
And there are many more, because a lot of women in fandom have decided that they’ve had enough of this bullshit.
I’ve seen this too, of course. I’ve talked about my adventures with Neckbeard Wondermen who lecture me – errantly – about computers. I’ve certainly had my share of talking-over… attempts. And I’ve had – in the past – the gropers and such.
But I don’t get harassed on the same scale. Not close to it; not in person, which is an important distinction. I’ve intervened between creepers and targets; I’ve got them thrown out of conventions – tho’ I’ve no idea how permanently – and I’ve seen it often. But I’m just a little too scary.
See, here’s the thing: harassment is about power. It’s about dominance, it’s about pushing people perceived as weak around, because you can, and because it’s safe to do so. The societal context tells men it’s okay to go after women in this way – large-scale religions tend to have this as a core value – and the constant barrage becomes wearying, making it easier. A slow grinding, if you will. (See, again, Brooke’s post.)
And all I had to do was become somewhat notorious as a supervillain with a penchant for disproportionate violence and questionable stability to stop it… in person. I have broken peoples’ ribs for pushing the wrong button – no, literally, for pushing the wrong physical button, it’s a funny story, I should tell it sometime.
To paraphrase The Annihilator, once one does that, choosing me as a target doesn’t seem so very safe anymore.
In person.
But get on, say, YouTube, or Google+, where there’s a lot of physical separation? And all those plays pop right back out.
Last year, Shanti and I hosted a series of online Google+ musical hangouts. They weren’t the hangouts-on-air, they were the original type, still in operation, where the attendance is limited to ten and you can’t boot people out. We were taking turns playing and inviting others in; the first couple of times were a lot of fun, and we met some people.
And that’s when the creepers started arriving.
Without fail, after that, when either of us did these, we’d start seeing men who would pop in and masturbate at us on camera. Whether we were both there, whether it was just one of us hosting alone, who else was in the room, none of that mattered. I hosted a session one night where I had four. They’d come in, drop pants, set camera on engorged dicks, and masturbate at us.
And we couldn’t kick them out. The only way to block them was to get everyone in the room to block them, and that was almost impossible – particularly when they’d show up in pairs to prevent it.
See, it’s all about power. The sexual component is power, and – even moreso – in violating your consent. And I can be all the supervillain I want to be, I can be as scary and intimidating in person as I want to be – but that doesn’t help if I don’t know where they are and can’t reach them.
Did we report this? Oh hell to the yes. Over and over again. We begged them for a solution of some sort, a moderated version of the hangout that would let us boot these people.
Google never even responded, not once, no matter how much we reported it. So I started posting about it in public; nothing. And then I took it to Twitter, posting about it several times a day for a while, tagging Google.
Silence.
So you see, it can be, will be, and is that bad, and the powers that be – whoever they are – will tell you to sit down and shut up, if they even deign to respond.
Even being a supervillain isn’t enough to change that. Mute it, sure. In person. Even people who don’t know the supervillain thing can feel the threat in my body language.
But as soon as they feel like they can’t get hurt? Oh my, yes, the game is back on. The only thing keeping it at bay is the threat.
And if that doesn’t illuminate clearly enough for you what sexual harassment is really about – well, I can only assume you don’t want to know.
This post is part of a collection of articles on sexism and racism in geek culture.
10 comments on Livejournal, 2 comments on Facebook.
Hear hear.
As it becomes less and less socially acceptable to fight back, harrassments will increase. Used to be if someone was a dick, sooner or later they’d get invited out behind the barn and taught a lesson. Not anymore. Now we empower the bullies by making it unacceptable to fight back on the spot, where it would do the most good.
It doesn’t have to be a punch in the nose. It can be “these are the conditions under which I will interact with you” and making it stick instead of backing away (admitting defeat) over and over. I know, I’ve done it, and funny thing — the bully instantly and permanently became a perfect gentleman around me.
@ReziaC: While that’s certainly what I do, I don’t agree that it’s the good solution, not really – because women aren’t supposed to fight back. And if we do, we get punished for it, and worse than the harassers. Look at the way townships line up to side with rapists against victims and the slut-shaming those victims receive; look at the cold hard fact that women who kill their abusers get longer and harsher sentences then men who kill their abused partners; it’s systemic. Women who resist this kind of abuse in other ways are often socially shunned as “bitches” and such for the act of resisting abuse – all those screencaps from SFF.net? They aren’t atypical.
So you have to address this on a wide front, and most importantly, the blame has to go to the aggressors, and those who aid them. It’s not a matter of “the right kind of” individual resistance and pushback – tho’ that’s always a component, realistically – it’s a matter of making it thoroughly unacceptable to start that shit, in general. And that takes more than the right kind of individual resistance.
My spouse works at Google, though not in the G+ group; I’ve shown him your post in hopes of getting a report made via different channels..
That’d be good. At least having the option of a moderator or moderators would help a lot.