{"id":7877,"date":"2015-08-11T13:40:21","date_gmt":"2015-08-11T20:40:21","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/?p=7877"},"modified":"2016-06-17T01:15:11","modified_gmt":"2016-06-17T08:15:11","slug":"on-sasquans-decision","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/2015\/08\/11\/on-sasquans-decision\/","title":{"rendered":"on sasquan&#8217;s decision and statement"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Sasquan Worldcon Committee have decided to override their harassment committee&#8217;s initial decision to to refund Mr. Antonelli&#8217;s membership &#8211; Mr. Antonelli being the Puppy slate nominee who <a href=\"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/2015\/08\/and-here-we-go-aswating\/\">attempted a slow-mo SWAT of David Gerrold<\/a> &#8211; and allow him to attend the convention.<\/p>\n<p>In <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/solarbird.net\/Livejournal\/2015-08\/sasquan-statement.gif\">the executive committee&#8217;s statement<\/a>, they say that Mr. Gerrold asked them to do this; that Mr. Gerrold believes that as a Hugo nominee &#8211; however dubious &#8211; Mr. Antonelli should be allowed to attend. As Mr. Gerrold was the target of the SWAT, I can accept that decision, if somewhat grudgingly.<\/p>\n<p>But they did <em>not<\/em> mention Ms. Cuinn, who received a fleet of death and rape threats after withdrawing her acceptance of Mr. Antonelli&#8217;s story following this matter. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/solarbird.net\/Livejournal\/2015-08\/me-swat-displeasure-2015-08-11.gif\">I have expressed my displeasure<\/a>, saying that they should&#8217;ve contacted her, too, and made sure <em>she<\/em> was okay with that.<\/p>\n<p>They have replied, saying <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smarier\/posts\/10153625707958573?comment_id=10153625798343573&#038;reply_comment_id=10153626029913573&#038;total_comments=17&#038;comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D\">they <em>did<\/em> talk to her and she <em>did<\/em> agree with the reversal in this case<\/a>. <b>eta: <strike>THIS IS CONTESTED.<\/strike> THIS HAS BEEN REDACTED. See below.<\/b> I can grudgingly accept that, as well. (Tho&#8217; &#8211; let&#8217;s be honest here &#8211; once Mr. Gerrold gave his nod, there was no way she <em>couldn&#8217;t<\/eM> go along without being socially eviscerated.)<\/p>\n<p>But that they did so was not in <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/solarbird.net\/Livejournal\/2015-08\/sasquan-statement.gif\">their statement<\/a>, so I had no way of knowing. I have suggested her assent in this belongs there, as well; <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/smarier\/posts\/10153625707958573?comment_id=10153625798343573&#038;reply_comment_id=10153626039933573&#038;total_comments=18&#038;comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R%22%7D\">at least one person from the committee agrees<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p>Given that the systematic harassment of women through rape and death threats has been such an endemic problem over the last few years, I am somewhat disappointed they didn&#8217;t realise that needed to be addressed publicly. However, the more important part is that they <em>did contact her<\/em>, and did get her signoff. I just wish they had taken a moment to say so.<\/p>\n<p><b>eta:<\/b> More and more complicated. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/JohnnyEponymous\/posts\/10153627474275955?comment_id=10153627498690955&#038;reply_comment_id=10153627546500955&#038;total_comments=1&#038;comment_tracking=%7B%22tn%22%3A%22R2%22%7D\">Ms. Cuinn says she was <em>not<\/em> contacted about banning Mr. Antonelli, and did not sign off on that with the concom<\/a>. She says that she was contacted about whether she wanted an investigation, but that&#8217;s different. She also says at that post (as a personal statement?) that Mr. Antonelli shouldn&#8217;t be banned because of what he threw at her &#8211; even though she does not believe his apology or that he didn&#8217;t know his crowd would go after her. But that&#8217;s not the same as signing off on the committee&#8217;s decision.<\/p>\n<p><b>eta2:<\/b> Sasquan concom member <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/solarbird.net\/Livejournal\/2015-08\/contested-2015-08-11.gif\">Marah Searle-Kovacevic apologises for her misstatement<\/a>, and confirms Ms. Cuinn&#8217;s version. <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/solarbird.net\/Livejournal\/2015-08\/marah-misstatement-apology.png\">[grab]<\/a><\/p>\n<p><b>eta3:<\/b> This leaves me in a rather odd position, really. Not in any sense of &#8220;what&#8217;s being said by whom,&#8221; but in the sense of how I feel about this. I was grudgingly okay based on <em>misinformation<\/em>, and I am less so on the <em>actual<\/em> information. But how much, I do not know.<\/p>\n<p>I mean, this is a high level of abuse. Even if the Slo-mo SWAT letter undoubtedly had &#8220;crackpot&#8221; written all over it, it&#8217;s still a crackpot dousing somebody in honey and whistling for bears. (The <em>crackpot<\/eM> part comes in when you apparently think that bears care if you whistle.)<\/p>\n<p>And then you get the hounds let loose on Ms. Cuinn. Yeah, I get it, it didn&#8217;t take place at the convention, and didn&#8217;t involve a guest. But it was direct fallout from an event that totally did, and the scooch-scooch-scooch-scooch-phew-we-can-not-care-about-this-on-a-technicality doesn&#8217;t entirely sit well with me.<\/p>\n<p>No sir &#8211; I don&#8217;t like it. Not one little bit. And I don&#8217;t have a good answer beyond that.<\/p>\n<p><b>eta4:<\/b> <a target=\"_blank\" href=\"http:\/\/www.pretty-terrible.com\/2015\/08\/11\/some-members-are-more-equal-than-others\/\">Pretty Terrible is Pretty Clear about how she feels about it<\/a>.<br \/>\n&nbsp;<\/p>\n<hr \/>\n<p>This part of <a href=\"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/2014\/02\/collection-the-sfwa-sexism-and-racism-posts\/\">a series of posts<\/a> on the Sad\/Rabid Puppy candidate slate-based capture of the Hugo Awards, and resulting fallout.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sasquan Worldcon Committee have decided to override their harassment committee&#8217;s initial decision to to refund Mr. Antonelli&#8217;s membership &#8211; Mr. Antonelli being the Puppy slate nominee who attempted a slow-mo SWAT of David Gerrold &#8211; and allow him to attend the convention. In the executive committee&#8217;s statement, they say that Mr. Gerrold asked them [&#038;hellip<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-7877","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7877","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7877"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7877\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9404,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7877\/revisions\/9404"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7877"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7877"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7877"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}