{"id":5725,"date":"2014-03-18T12:04:08","date_gmt":"2014-03-18T19:04:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/?p=5725"},"modified":"2014-03-18T12:04:08","modified_gmt":"2014-03-18T19:04:08","slug":"the-problems-in-tech-a-lovely-example","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/2014\/03\/18\/the-problems-in-tech-a-lovely-example\/","title":{"rendered":"the problems in tech: a lovely example"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>James Nicoll pointed to <a href=\"http:\/\/scripting.com\/2014\/03\/17\/royWildstein.html\">this post on Scripting News<\/a>, wherein the author tells a story about a guy he hired who didn&#8217;t do any work, had to be fired, then sued on the basis of discrimination, all back in 1985. The author lays out this gem:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>[E]very time a company hires someone who is not a young male, they run the risk that the new hire isn&#8217;t there to work, rather is there to scam you.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>&#8230;and proceeds to deny that he&#8217;s advocating only hiring young white men. (The white part comes in later, in comments.)<\/p>\n<p>Here&#8217;s my reply, in case it doesn&#8217;t get unscreened:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The statement that you made very much advocates hiring only young males, whether you want it to or not.\u2028\u2028&#8221;[E]very time a company hires someone who is not a young male, they run the risk that the new hire isn&#8217;t there to work, rather is there to scam you.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The meaning of the sentence is that people who aren&#8217;t young men might just be scamming you, <em>and<\/em> that young males, by exception, are <em>not<\/em> out to scam you.<\/p>\n<p>\u2028Young women need not apply: might be out to scam you! Anyone over whatever your definition of &#8220;young&#8221; age is need not apply: might be out to scam you! Risky! Young men, by contrast: <em>not<\/em> part of the problem; <em>not<\/em> out to scam you.<\/p>\n<p>What do you <em>think<\/em> this advocates?<\/p>\n<p>And yes, there is an implicit whiteness in this, by virtue of the point of &#8220;Roy&#8221; using civil rights laws to sue you. C.f. all the people in comments picking it up, and comments already made that &#8220;this scam only works because of protected classes.&#8221;\u00a0You may not want to own that, but you put it out there.<\/p>\n<p>\u2028The underlying assertion, of course, is bullshit. I&#8217;ve seen exactly this work behaviour out of your &#8220;young males&#8221; more than once. When I was at Microsoft in particular, I saw this a couple of times, and how your &#8220;young men&#8221; had to be so carefully nudged out the door to prevent <em>them<\/em> from being able to sue either. I saw your &#8220;young males&#8221; doing it when I was doing research in academia. It was project-destroying.<\/p>\n<p>But that&#8217;s not part of your story, now, is it?<\/p>\n<p>Stories matter. We tell stories for reasons, and we pick stories we think have meaning, and meaning we want to communicate. And yours, here, communicates certain things very clearly &#8211; whether you want to admit it or not.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>My only regret is failing to mention that exactly this thinking is exactly how Bitcoin&#8217;s Reddit forum had posted <em>in their FAQ<\/eM> not to do business with people identifying as women online, <em>because it was probably a scam<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Awfully similar language, don&#8217;t you think?<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>James Nicoll pointed to this post on Scripting News, wherein the author tells a story about a guy he hired who didn&#8217;t do any work, had to be fired, then sued on the basis of discrimination, all back in 1985. The author lays out this gem: [E]very time a company hires someone who is not [&#038;hellip<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5725","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-uncategorized"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5725","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=5725"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5725\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=5725"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=5725"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/crimeandtheforcesofevil.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=5725"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}